Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hypertension ; 59(5): 934-42, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22493073

RESUMO

Hypertension guidelines advise limiting the dose of thiazide diuretics and avoiding combination with ß-blockade, because of increased risk of diabetes mellitus. We tested whether changes in the 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test could be detected after 4 weeks of treatment with a thiazide and could be avoided by switching to amiloride. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed. In study 1 (41 patients), we found that changes in glucose during a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test could be detected after 4 weeks of treatment with bendroflumethiazide. In study 2, 37 patients with essential hypertension received, in random order, 4 weeks of once-daily treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 to 50 mg, nebivolol 5 to 10 mg, combination (HCTZ 25-50 mg+nebivolol 5-10 mg), amiloride (10-20 mg), and placebo. Each drug was force titrated at 2 weeks and separated by a 4-week placebo washout. At each visit, we recorded blood pressure and performed a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Primary outcome was the difference in glucose (over the 2 hours of the oral glucose tolerance test) between 0 and 4 weeks, when HCTZ and amiloride were compared by repeated-measures analysis. For similar blood pressure reductions, there were opposite changes in glucose between the 2 diuretics (P<0.0001). Nebivolol did not impair glucose tolerance, either alone or in combination. There was a negative correlation between Δpotassium and Δ2-hour glucose (r=-0.28; P<0.0001). In 2 crossover studies, 4 weeks of treatment with a thiazide diuretic impaired glucose tolerance. No impairment was seen with K(+)-sparing diuretic or ß(1)-selective blockade. Substitution or addition of amiloride may be the solution to preventing thiazide-induced diabetes mellitus.


Assuntos
Amilorida/administração & dosagem , Atenolol/administração & dosagem , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Hidroclorotiazida/administração & dosagem , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Amilorida/efeitos adversos , Atenolol/efeitos adversos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Estudos Cross-Over , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Hidroclorotiazida/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
2.
Metabolism ; 55(9): 1165-70, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16919534

RESUMO

Circulating sialic acid is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is higher in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sialic acid is associated with body mass index, but it is uncertain whether body fat contributes to the higher levels of sialic acid in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, we have investigated whether the higher levels of sialic acid observed in type 2 diabetes mellitus persist when controlling for fatness. Fasting plasma samples were collected from 24 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 24 controls. Percentage of body fat was measured by bioelectrical impedance. Plasma sialic acid was quantified by an enzymatic method. Plasma sialic acid was higher in the group with type 2 diabetes mellitus than controls (602 +/- 14 vs 545 +/- 14 mg/L, P = .007). Percentage of body fat was associated with plasma sialic acid concentration in both the control group (r = 0.481, P = .020) and the group with type 2 diabetes mellitus (r = 0.527, P = .007). Fasting glucose was also associated with plasma sialic acid in the group with type 2 diabetes mellitus (r = 0.700, P < .001). Adjustment for percentage of body fat accounted for the higher levels of sialic acid in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Using linear regression, 54.3% of the variation of plasma sialic acid was explained by percentage of body fat and glucose concentrations in the whole group. Seventy-four percent of sialic acid variation was explained by the same model in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, this is the first study to show that percentage of body fat predicts plasma sialic acid concentration and contributes toward higher levels of sialic acid in type 2 diabetes mellitus.


Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Composição Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Ácido N-Acetilneuramínico/sangue , Tecido Adiposo , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
3.
Diabetes Care ; 26(12): 3243-9, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14633809

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Women with type 2 diabetes appear to lose the protection against cardiovascular disease afforded by estrogens. We examined the effects of menopausal status on postprandial clearance of dietary fat in healthy and diabetic women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fasting subjects (premenopausal and postmenopausal control subjects, premenopausal and postmenopausal diabetic women, all n = 8) were given a meal containing the stable isotope 1,1,1-(13)C-tripalmitin, with blood and breath sampled for 6 and 24 h, respectively, in the postprandial period. Lower levels of (13)C-palmitic acid ((13)C-PA) in the triglyceride fraction implies more efficient chylomicron clearance, lower levels of (13)C-PA in the nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) fraction implies improved dietary NEFA entrapment, and higher levels of (13)CO(2) in the breath denote more efficient of oxidation of dietary-derived lipid. RESULTS: In diabetic women, there were no differences between the pre- and postmenopausal groups for any of these parameters. In contrast, premenopausal control subjects, compared with postmenopausal control subjects, had lower (13)C-PA in the triglyceride fraction area under the curve (AUC) (premenopausal median [range] 25.2 [12.1-49.4 mmol/l] per 6 h, postmenopausal 48.5 [15.5-77.2 mmol/l] per 6 h; P < 0.01) and higher (13)CO(2) levels in the breath AUC (premenopausal 22.5 [18.0-31.5%] of administered dose, postmenopausal 17.2 [11.2-31.5%] of administered dose; P < 0.01) with no difference between groups in levels of (13)C-PA in the NEFA fraction AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The premenopausal advantage in clearance of dietary lipid is not seen in premenopausal diabetic women. This is likely to promote an atherogenic lipoprotein profile and may contribute to the loss of cardiovascular disease protection seen in diabetic women.


Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Lipídeos/sangue , Período Pós-Prandial/fisiologia , Pré-Menopausa , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Humanos , Insulina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Triglicerídeos/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...